top - download
⟦aca10dd1d⟧ Wang Wps File
Length: 51971 (0xcb03)
Types: Wang Wps File
Notes: DIVERSE TELEX CAMPS
Names: »4742A «
Derivation
└─⟦ce4ce986f⟧ Bits:30006193 8" Wang WCS floppy, CR 0449A
└─ ⟦this⟧ »4742A «
WangText
1984-01-16
knn/vhn
to: shnmo division
att.: mr.
david levy,
contracting
officer
cc.: ltc henning
hofmann, camps
program manager
fm: christian
rovsing a/s,
denmark
kurt nybroe-nielsen
our ref: cps/101/tlx/1105
subject: invoice
status
-----------------------
This is the
invoice status
of not paid
invoices as
of today:
Invoice No. Due Currency D.Kr.
----------- --- -------- -----
25945 820210 Us dllrs. 12,634.35
30756 830223 411,452.64
25958 821010 5,651.90
30963 830403 Us dllrs. 20,460.61
30611 830530 67,462.80
30619 830530 Us lbs 55,159.18
34569 830930 266,328.59
31173 830930 Uk lbs 94,632.95
31170 830813 259,602.30
34577 831130 Us dllrs. 3,680.26
35752 831130 50,494.33
35755 831120 4,560,151.20
35756 831120 Us dllrs. 188,971.74
35757 840212 Us dllrs. 379,950.83
36805 840212 Uk lbs. 216,225.12
36806 840212 3,491,003.18
36807 840212 3,587,439.00
36808 840212 Us dllrs. 136,484.80
37320 840229 us dllrs. 37,861.68
37334 840229 us dllrs. 43,937.99
37335 840229 1,475,708.07
37380 840229 294,411.80
37381 Us dllrs. 39,578.42
kind regards,
christian rovsing a/s
kurt nybroe-nielsen
1983-11-11 jho/bko
to: shnmo division
att.: mr. david levy, contracting officer
cc.: ltc henning hofmann, camps program manager
fm: christian rovsing a/s, denmark
kurt nybroe-nielsen
our ref: cps/101/tlx/1042
subject: unsettled invoices on camps project
--------------------------------------------
Listed below please find the invoices which are due for payment,
but are still wholly or partly unsettled:
inv.date inv.no. due date amount dkr. unpaid
dkr. ref.
311281 24921 150282 970,254,88 126,972,66 9118
310882 25958 101082 378,972,60 5,651,90 9009
300383 30611 300583 67,462,80 67,462,80 9009
231282 30756 230283 411,452,64 411,452,64 2321
310583 31162 310783 148,646,89 60,08 9009
130683 31170 130883 259,602,30 259,602,30 9009
310783 34569 300983 2,382,970,50 2,382,970,50 9009
inv.date inv.no. due date amount dlrs. unpaid
dlrs. ref.
300682 25440 300882 105,225,10 20,004,57 9009
310882 25945 021082 80,938,35 12,634,35 9009
300383 30610 300583 179,385,26 89,692,63 9009
231282 30749 230283 69,591,04 69,591,04 9009
030283 30963 030483 20,460,61 20,460,61 9009
310583 31713 310783 179,385,26 35,877,06 9009
310783 34568 300983 421,375,05 3,227,70 9009
inv.date inv.no. due date amount p.uk. unpaid
p.uk. ref.
201282 30613 200283 19,549,85 11,729,93 9009
300383 30619 300583 110,318,36 110,318,36 9009
310583 31167 310783 110,318,36 22,063,74 9009
310783 31173 300983 94,632,95 94,632,95 9009
inv.date inv.no. due date amount dm. unpaid
dm. ref.
310783 31174 300983 326,464,40 326,464,40 9009
please explain why the overdue invoices have not yet been
wholly paid.
kind regards,
christian rovsing a/s
kurt nybroe-nielsen
1983-09-01 bhb/vhn
to: shnmo division
att.: mr. paul f. shey, contracting officer
cc.: ltc henning hofmann, camps program manager
fm: christian rovsing a/s, denmark
kurt nybroe-nielsen
our ref: cps/101/tlx/0946
subject: camps hardware status
------------------------------
ref.: a) shape telex, camps log no. 1351
b) cr telex, cps/101/tlx/0942, 830825
c) cr telex, cps/101/tlx/0905, 830719
d) mom shape/cr no. 33, 830706
e) fat report, site 12, cps/trp/017, 830718
1 This telex provides comments to the questions regarding
potential problems in the camps hardware raised by
shape in ref a).
in addition a general statement on the current hardware
status on the camps site equipment is provided based
on cr's experience during integration and test.
2 Head alignment problem in the disk units. (ref a, sect.
1a)
-----------------------------------------------------------
The investigations indicated in CR telex, ref c, have
been continued, and the problem has been resolved as
follows:
2.1 The initial boot as used in the FAT test boots up
a "boot module" containing all programs used in
the test procedure.
This boot operation is driven by the DAMU program located
in PROM's on the MIA-module.
The DAMU boot program is more sensible to read errors
than the DAMOS handler used in operation (it is not
able to adjust head position etc).
By analysis of the current version of the DAMU program
the following was detected:
a) The DAMU is specified for 10 retries.
b) The current version made only one try, but the error
code indicated 10.
A new updated release will be issued after test. The
scheduled date for release is october 1, 1983.
The new version DAMU will be issued as an ECO to the
MIA-module.
2.2 The test disk pack used for test in the latest fat's
has been generated on a disk drive, which is out
of alignment after repair at cr.
2.2.1 head alignment is done using a "ce-packet",
i.e. a specially prepared disk with the cylinders placed
precisely according to specifications.
2.2.2 cr has several ce-packets available inhouse
and tests have shown that one is beyond specified tolerances.
2.2.3 our repair log shows that this defect ce-packet
has been used for repair of the disk drive used for
generating the fat-disk pack.
2.2.4 the following actions have been initiated:
a) re-adjustment of disk drive
b) production of new fat-disk packs.
c) check of disk drives in the sites 8,12 and 14 and
all other camps disk drives available at cr, which
are suspected to be out of alignment.
d) elimination of all disk packs produced on misaligned
disk drives.
e) to ensure that feasible preventive field maintenance
actions minimates the risk for incompatibilities
between camps sites in the field
ce-packet
dmm boot programs
3 vdu failure rate for site 12 (ref a, sect 1b)
---------------------------------------------
3.1 shape's question regarding vdu failure rate has
been raised based on the ncr-overview in the FAT-report,
(ref e), appendix c.
3.2 this ncr-overview presents all problems encountered
by the test engineer throughout the site integration
period.
this overview is included in the test report on shape's
request.
All updates and repair on the vdu's are handled by
the repair group within the ils-department at cr, which
is going to take over the responsibility for repair
in the warranty period.
The current work sharing between ils-repair and the
camps integration team includes that final test is
done by the integration team.
For the site 12-vdu's the final test has been conducted
in the site 12-integation period and, therefore, the
observed problems have (correctly) been included in
the FAT 12 report.
3.3 cr has analysed the reported VDU failures, and provides
the following information for clarification: (reference:
ref e, appendix c):
8 vdu's failed
ERR.NO. VDU Description
------ --- -----------
32 741275 Picture unstable. crt board failure.
34 741676 ee prom malfunction part/pmm board
failure.
35 741430 keyboard malfunction. keyboard/cable
failure
39 741697 brightness/contrast malfunction.
crt system failure.
48 741416 dmm board failure.
49 741667 picture unstable. crt board failure.
53 741426 dmm board failure.
57 741652 wrong display - due to bad eprom.
comments:
unstable picture means a slight vertical wave on the
screen and is due to an error in the crt circuit.
dmm board failure means an error in the ram area of
this board that is a ram-chip has failed.
bad eprom. cr updates all vdu eproms during integration,
occationally one of these proms passes chip verification,
but fails when mounted in vdu.
3.4 cr is continuously monitoring the failure
rate of the vdu's and the rest of the equipment
after fat.
our observations have not displayed any new trends
regarding the reliability of the vdu's.
the control check on the site 12 vdu's (ref b) shows
that after an accumulated time of use of more than
10.000 (ten thousand) hours, no vdu's had failed.
3.5 cr's conclusion at this point of time is that
a) no needs have been observed for changing cr's
testing of the vdu's in order to improve reliability
in use
b) no trends have been observed which call for
further investigation.
4. msp problems
------------
4.1 the ncr overview in the fat report for site
12 identifies 2 msp's with printing problems:
err.no serial no description
------ --------- -----------
55 72 bad printing. print head driver
board defective
56 18 dots missing. failure in motherboard.
the boards have been returned to
tracor for repair.
5. intermittend system dumps
-------------------------
5.1 shape telex, ref a) states an internal shape
document as reference. cr would appreciate
to have the report available in order to check,
if all the problems reported have been covered
by internal problem reports at cr.
5.2 based on problems reported in the period of
f.michel's stay at cr, several aspects seem
to be involved:
a) software is currently under test. specially is a
lot of updates under test on channels supported
by the tdx-system
b) in a number of cases, the system is halted with
an error code stating "sti-dma error"
5.3 a problem report has been established on the "sti-dma
error". the following actions have been taken to
eliminate the problem:
a) an eco, (no 808) has been released
this eco updates the sti-micro-f/w (ic's no: 1885
to 1893) from rev.10 to rev.11. the module is changed
from rev. 3a to 3b.
this eco reduced the frequency of the "sti-dma"
error a factor 10 (ten)
b) a reference system was dedicated troubleshooting
of the problem
the h/w of this system was checked intensely. the
result of this check was that no hardware deficiencies
were observed.
c) a new release of tdx-system-f/w is almost through
test and will be released shortly. this new release
amongst other also includes some modifications,
which eliminates identified potential sources of
the sti-dma-error.
after release from development will this new release
f/w be installed on the reference system for further
observations.
5.4 status today is that on no h/w-items have been observed
qualified defects in relation to the sti-dma problem.
the new release of the tdx-f/w will be handled as
eco's for 3 modules: sti, tia, ltux-s.
6. the trouble shooting of the sti-dma failure is being
monitored very closely to ensure coordination of
effords and availability and of the best qualified
resources.
current status based on the camps sites in use for
integration at cr is that the sti-dma-error is the
only pending malfunction problem, where the h/w design
cannot be totally out of suspicion.
kind regards,
christian rovsing a/s
kurt nybroe-nielsen
1983-07-14 jho/vhn
to: shnmo division
att.: mr. paul f. shey, contracting officer
cc.: ltc henning hofmann, camps program manager
fm: christian rovsing a/s, denmark
kurt nybroe-nielsen
our ref: cps/101/tlx/0897
subject: invoices due for payment
---------------------------------
the following invoices are due for payment:
invoice no. due date missing amount payment covers
------------------------------------------------------------
24920 x 820301 dlrs. 33,100.07 7 vdu's
24921 x 820301 dkr. 126,972.66 7 vdu's
25440 x 820830 dlrs. 23,251.48 4 vdu's
30361 830220 pound 11,729.92 off-line modules
30749 x 830223 dlrs. 69,591.04 test spec
30756 830223 Dkr. 411,452.64 rspl/manuals
25945 x 820210 dlrs. 80,938.35 6 mmd, 18 omdt
30963 x 830403 dlrs. 20,460.61 printer nato
30618 x 830530 dlrs. 38,481.45 8 stat mux
30604 x 830530 dlrs. 152,960.34 ptrp spares
30607 x 830530 dlrs. 13,528.49 15 tables
30611 x 830530 Dkr. 67,462.80 FAT 5, 15
30610 x 830530 dlrs. 179,385.26 FAT 5, 15
30619 x 830530 pound 110,310.36 FAT 5, 15
30626 x 830628 dlrs. 7,020.06 cr spares
30627 x 830628 dkr. 84,765.02 cr spares
please inform us of the reasons for withhelding payment for each
invoice marked with an (x). for all other invoices the reasons
are known and a correspondence has taken place.
kind regards,
christian rovsing a/s
kurt nybroe-Nielsen
1983-04-19 knn/vhn
to: CR corp
att.: borge riis vestergaard
fm: christian rovsing a/s
kurt nybroe-nielsen
our ref.: cps/110/tlx/0100
subject nicstare spare parts production
---------------------------------------
ref a) crc/fax/029, 18. feb. 1983
we hereby forward the quotation requested in ref a.
the prices quoted should be those litton gets.
how we (cr corp/cr a/s) split the money is subject to
negotiation.
we have two problems. one is to know the latest eco
status of the subject modules and second how are we
going to system test the spare part products.
as we know that modules have been modified since they
left cr corp, litton must have the latest eco status.
please send this to us.
as we do not intend to send spare parts to litton, which
have not been system tested, we have to find away of
establishing a system at cr a/s production division.
how can you support us?
qty.
Item description unit price p/n a+b a+c d
no. d.kr.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
1 av24 i/f 14.829 10.0119-8 1 2
6
2 32k ram 48.230 10.0142-2 10 14 22
3 esccp i/f 9.225 10.0143-0 1 2
6
4 mbc 14.017 10.0111-2 1 2
8
5 comm-cpu 48.697 10.0112-0 1 2 15
6 l3050 i/f 37.462 10.0120-1 1 2
9
7 PROM 4k 22.512 10.0115-5 1 2 12
8 4k ram 25.116 10.0114-7 1 2 10
9 power supply 27.889 10.0174-0 7 10 20
10 awr master 4.175 10.0132-5 5 6
6
11 abe slave 5.367 10.0344-9 5 6
7
12 k/a ltu 24.028 10.0122-8 45 50 42
13 sync ltu 26.730 10.0124-4 11 16 12
14 i/a ltu 24.751 10.0123-6 2 4 12
15 comm crate 21.430 10.0127-9 1 2
5
16 mux crate 21.430 10.0145-7 1 2
5
17 ltu crate 21.430 10.0128-7 5 6
6
18 ls crate 1.539 10.0146-5 6 6
6
19 ls crate cable
set 359 19.0020-5 30+30 36+36 5+5
x1
19.0024-8
20 ls int. 2.030 15.0034-5 4 4
5
21 ls ext. 2.030 15.0033-7 67 67
6
22 mains filter 6.682 4.07002-00 1 2
3
23 mux-cpu 50.980 10.0113-9 1 2
5
24 rack, 3 bay 45.696 stanton (2/3) (1)
0
x2
25 fan assy. 4.398 4.13100-00 5 8
8
26 power dist. pan. 2.002 nics tare 1 2
0
type
27 power cable 643 10.0151-1 7 10
5
28 abf cable set 466 10.0150-3 10 12
6
29 com mux cable 374 10.0147-3 2 4
5
30 cpu ctrl. cable 128 10.0148-1 2 4
5
31 cpu ctrl. cable 512 10.0153-8 5 6
5
32 l3050 cable 403 nics tare
type 2 4
5
33 ground wires 217 var. type 25 40 15
34 blank panels
(130) 130 var. type 5 30
0
35 brackets 144 var. type 36 52
0
36 not used
37 dual par. i/f 33.700 10.0125-2 0 0
2
38 p.d. i/f 30.860 10.0126-0 0 0
2
39 formatter cable 3.024 10.0154-6 0 0
2
40 fuses ? var. types 0 0 lot
(tbd)
41 screws ? var. types 0 0 lot
(tbd)
42 washers ? var. types 0 0 lot
(tbd)
43 nuts ? var. types 0 0 lot
(tbd)
44 air filter 44 var. types 0 0 lot
(tbd)
45 not used
46 peripheral paris ? var. types 0 0 lot
(tbd)
x1 (half of left/and half of right oriented cables)
x2) crc will supply this
latest news
-----------
gert called me and informed me of a price list from 23/6
1980. i have not been able to find this. please send it
by fax to me.
please indicate if the current price is ok, or out in the
blue.
furthermore, we have identified the following problems.
- we do not have complete documentation for all boards.
(some was thrown out during clean-up/moving)
- dual parallel i/f and floppy disk i/f are very difficult
to produce as erik berthelsen is not with us any longer.
- the 4-bit slice 2901 is no longer produced and we have
not got these on stock.
- the 3050 i/f is very difficult to produce if gotlob
borup is not able to support us.
I am ready to forward new prices based on the 1980 pricelist.
kind regards,
christian rovsing a/s
kurt nybroe-nielsen
1984-02-02 JAL/dhh
To: Tracor
att: mr. Ben Medley
Fm: Christian Rovsing A/S, Denmark
Kurt Nybroe-Nielsen
our re. cps/108/tlx/0149
Subject: Paper-out status
-------------------------
One of the printers from last shipment, received in december
1983 has been tested for the paper-out problem. Apparently
the unknown status reports are not generated on this
printer, but the problem concerning too many identical
status reports still occur. In addition we have detected
a false paper-out condition.
The detailed test set-up and test results are descriped
in the following:
Test at printer 232 (received December 1983)
Testcases 9-10:
---------------
In printing a message then "paper out" occur. The key
are turned OFF. Insert paper and push FORM FEED button.
Turn key ON.
Testcase 10:
------------
A false "paper in" condition also occur.
Testcase 11-12:
---------------
Instead of the key, the suspend print button are used.
Testcase 13:
------------
Only FORM FEED button are used after inserting the paper.
Testcase 14-15:
---------------
Detection of false "paper out" condition in 2 situations.
Testcase 9
----------
DTE DCE Comments
Paper out, key OFF
9B
D3
0D
7F
85
9B
D3
0D
7F
85
7F Insert paper, push FORM FEED button
01
9B
D3
0D
7F
01
7F Turn key ON
80
7F Send too many status reports
80
7F
80
7F
80
7F
80
7F
80
9B From here printer react as expected
D3
0D
7F
80
9B
D3
0D
7F
80
Testcase 10
-----------
DTE DCE
Paper out
9B
D3
0D
7F
04
7F Turn key off
05
7F Press line feed button (false paper in)
01
9B
D3
0D
7F
01
7F Press LINE FEED button
85
9B
D3
0D
7F
85
Repeated many times
9B
D3
0D
7F
85
7F Inset paper, press FORM FEED button
01
9B
D3
0D
7F
01
7F Turn key ON
80
7F Send too many status reports
80
7F
80
9B From here printer react as expected
D3
0D
Testcase 11
-----------
DTE DCE
Paper out, SUSP. PRINT
9B
D3
0D
7F
04
7F Insert paper, FORM FEED
80
9B
D3
0D
7F
80 Push suspend print button
7F
80 Send too many status reports
7F
80
7F
80
7F
80
7F
80
7F
80
9B From here printer react as expected
D3
0D
7F
80
Testcase 12
-----------
DTE DCE
Paper out, SUSP. PRINT
9B
D3
0D
7F
04
7F Insert paper, FORM FEED
80
9B
D3
0D
7F
80 Push suspend print button
7F
80 Send too many status reports
7F
80
7F
80
7F
80
9B From here printer react as expected
D3
0D
7F
80
Testcase 13
-----------
DTE DCE
Paper out
9B
D3
0D
7F
04
7F Insert paper, FORM FEED
80
7F Send too many status reports
80
7F
80
7F
80
7F
80
9B From here printer react as expected
D3
0D
7F
80
This test was excecuted 3 times with the same result.
Testcase 14
-----------
DTE DCE Comments
9B Printer OK
D3
0D
7F
80
9B
D3
0D
7F
80
7F No real paper out (no touch the printer)
04
7F
80
9B Printer continue as expected
D3
0D
7F
80
Testcase 15
-----------
DTE DCE ASCII COMMENTS
Printer ok
9B
D3
0D
7F
80
0D CR Start printing
8A LF
0D CR
8A LF
7F False paper out
20
04
20
20
20
20
20
20 Our program stopped sending data
to printer
9B
D3
0d
7F
04
9B
D3
0D
7F
04
9B
D3
0D
7F Hang in paper out situation until
04
7F push LINE FEED button
80
7F
80
9B
D3
0D
7F
80
0D Start printing again
8A
We hope those additional informations will help you solving
the problem quickly.
Kind regards,
Christian Rovsing A/S
Kurt Nybroe-Nielsen
1984-03-07
JAL/dhh
to: Delta Data, USA
att. mr. Steve Miller
fm: Christian Rovsing A/S, Denmark
Jurt Nybroe-Nielsen
our ref. cps/104/tlx/0232
Subject: 7260 tc, status or prom 2.22
-------------------------------------
CR has retested the bugs mentioned on your telex 1. March 1982:
Bug 7.54 - Flow control
-----------------------
CR has verified that the VDU behaves like statet by Delta in
the telex. But in our openion this behaviour is not convenient.
The off condition of CTS circuit should not influence transmission
from host to VDU.
Following test was carried out by CR:
Mode:TTY. CTS circuit is in off condition. From the keyboard
four chars are entered, then six chars are send from the host
to the VDU. Until now no chars are processed by the VDU.
Now CTS is turned on. Now the characters are processed as follows:
The first keyboard char - the six host chars - the remaining
three keyboard chars. Is this behaviour correct? Is the host
buffer priority higher than the priority of the keyboard buffer?
- Please comment.
Bug 7.70 - missing key data when CTS disabled
---------------------------------------------
Mode:TTY. If the CTS curcuit is in off condition only ten key
entries (PF-key and other keys) are allowed. Further keyboard
entries are discarded by the VDU due to keyboard buffer overflow.
please comment.
Bug 7.73 - clear to end of line
-------------------------------
The bug is corrected.
Bug 7.76 - buffer full/buffer wait state
----------------------------------------
CR has observed following:
When the keyboard is activated during host update of the VDu
split the VDU stays in buffer full/buffer wait state. Perhaps
bug no. 7.76 and bug no. 7.90 are identical - please comment.
Bug 7.79 - mandatory fields do not work
---------------------------------------
The bug is corrected.
Bug 7.86 - shift out sequence over more than one block
------------------------------------------------------
The bug is closed. It has not been possible to duplicate the
error with monitor version 2.22.
hereafter the status is:
Bug.no. Status Description
-------------------------------------
7.01-7.52 closed
7.53 closed delta manual update is missing
7.54 open flow control
7.55-7.58 closed
7.59 open arm status transmit (p.t. not used)
7.60-7.69 closed
7.70 open missing key data when cts disabled
7.71-7.72 closed
7.73 closed no clear to end of line (p.t. not used)
7.73 open no clear to end of line (p.t.not used)
7.74 closed
7.75 closed
7.76 open buffer full/buffer wait state
7.77 closed insert 80 char field
7.78 closed
7.79 closed mandatory fields do not work (not used p.t.)
7.80 open interrupt type s (non deterministic)
7.81-7.82 closed
7.83 open function keys during xmit
7.84 closed insert line ending in col.80
7.85 open vdu stays in xmit mode r
7.86 closed shiftout sequence over more than one block
(oe 27 in the end of block one and 44 in
the beginning of block two)
7.87 withdrawn vdu display is out of control when transmitting
124 lines of 69 characters ending in column
80.
7.88 withdrawn loss of data for 12.000 char message.
7.89 closed bell signal when compressing vdu memory.
7.90 open keyboard activation during host update of
VDU split.
7.91 open break from host to vdu
7.92 closed protection of reset key
7.93 open back-tab key
CR still expects a status on the remaining open bugs.
Kind regrads,
CHRISTIAN ROVSING A/S
Kurt Nybroe-Nielsen
1984-02-08 JAL/dhh
to: Delta Data, USA
att: mr. Steve Miller
fm: Christian Rovsing A/S, Denmark
Kurt Nybroe Nielsen
our ref: cps/104/tlx/0227
Subject: Delta 7260 tc, errors in prom version 2.22
---------------------------------------------------
In prom version 2.22 received 840203 some of the major
bugs have been corrected, allthough the insert line function
still is very slow.
Bug 7.91 still exist. The detailed test-sequence is described
below:
Monitor version 2.22
Bug 7.91 - Break from host to VDU
---------------------------------
As statet before the acknowledgement phases in the VDU
are not reset upon receiving a break sequence from the
host.
To show that the phases in the Delta VDU are not reset
following test sequence can be used:
1. Power off-on the VDU. Configurate the VDU to 2400 bps
odd parity
2. Enter block mode as follows:
a) host sends break to VDU for 256 ms
b) host waits for 1 s
c) host sends:
0E 5D 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80
3. host request key status:
a) host to VDU:
02 0E AB 76 83 B5 32
b) VDU to host:
86 B0 40 13
02 40 4C 40 83 34 C4 04
4. From the keyboard following character sequence is entered:
SOM 1 2 3 4 5 EOM
5. The entered character sequence is now readed from the
host:
a) host to VDU:
02 0E B0 DC 40 B0 B0 B5 31 83 32 37
b) VDU to host:
86 31 40 13
02 40 31 32 B3 34 B5 83 37 B0 13
c) host to VDU:
86 B0
6. host request key status:
a) host to VDU
02 0E AB 76 83 B5 32
b) VDU to host
86 B0 40 13
02 40 4C 40 83 34 C4 04
7. Now the host resets the VDU as follows:
a) host sends break to VDU for 256 ms
b) host waits for 1 s
c) host sends:
0E 5D 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80
Because the VDU is already in block mode the last
char
sequence should be ignored - and so it is.
8. The host request key status:
a) host to VDU
02 0E AB 76 83 B5 32
b) VDU to host:
86 31 02 40 4C 40 83 34 C4 04
This is wrong. The phase should be B0 and not 31.
c) host to VDU:
02 0E AB 76 83 B5 32
d) VDU host:
86 B0 02 40 4C 40 83 34 C4 04
8. From the keyboard following character sequence is entered:
SOM 1 2 3 4 5 EOM
9. The entered character sequence is now readed from the
host
a) host to VDU:
02 0E B0 DC 40 B0 B0 B5 31 83 32 37
b) VDU to host:
86 31 40 13
02 40 31 32 B3 34 B5 83 37 B0 13
c) host to VDU:
86 B0
d) VDU to host:
02 40 31 32 B3 34 B5 83 37 B0 13
The VDU retransmits the message because it expects
an
acknowledgement 1 from the host. This is wrong.
The VDU
should expect an acknowledgement with the phase
0.
e) VDU to host:
85 04
f) host to VDU
86 B0
Hereafter the status of problems is as follows:
bug no. status description
-----------------------------------
7.01-7.52 closed
7.53 closed delta manual update is missing
7.54 open flow control
7.55-7.58 closed
7.59 open arm status transmit (p.t.not used)
7.60-7.69 closed
7.70 open missing key data when cts disabled
7.71-7.72 closed
7.73 open no clear to end of line (p.t.not used)
7.74 closed
7.75 closed
7.76 open buffer full/buffer wait state
7.77 closed insert 80 char field
7.78 closed
7.79 open mandatory fields do not work (not used
p.t.)
7.80 open interrupt type s (non deterministic)
7.81-7.82 closed
7.83 open function keys during xmit
7.84 closed insert line ending in col.80
7.85 open vdu stays in xmit mode r
7.86 open shiftout sequence over more than one
block (oe 27 in the end of block one
and 44 in the beginning of block two)
7.87 withdrawn vdu display is out of control when transmitting
124 lines of 69 characters ending in
column 80.
7.88 withdrawn loss of data for 12.00 char message.
7.89 closed bell signal when compressing vdu memory.
7.90 open keyboard activation during host update
of VDU split.
7.91 open break from host to vdu
7.92 closed protection of reset key
We look forward to receive a version where the remaining bugs
has been corrected
Kind regards,
CHRISTIAN ROVSING A/S
Kurt Nybroe-Nielsen
1984-01-18 jal/bko
to: tracor, usa
att: mr.t.m.rodgers
fm: christian rovsing a/s, denmark
kurt nybroe-nielsen
our ref: cps/108/tlx/0145
subject: errors on tracor printer
---------------------------------
on the tracor printer we have detected two problems concerning
the paper out status.
the problems, which are probably due to bugs in the tracor printer
firmware, are non-deterministic, but do normally occur after
less than ten attempts. A detailed description of the problems
are outlined below.
problem 1.
----------
the sequence of events is as follows:
1. printer status: paper out
2. the printer does not respond at status request
3. the key is turned off. the printer sends a asynchronous
report:
paper out, key off
4. at next status request the printer sends response:
paper out.
(no change at printer). then comes a synchron report:
paper out, key off.
5. the next 3 status requests give same response.
6. then only a paper out response and after that no
response.(see copy of com.tester).
the sequence on the com-tester is:
ltux mstp
dte dce comments
---------------------------
paper out
9b esc request paper status
d3 3
0d cr
9b no response to status
d3
0d
9b
d3
0d
.
.
.
.
9b
d3
0d turn key off
7f
85 paper out, key off
9b
d3
0d
7f
04 paper out )
7f )erroneous answer !
85 paper out, key off)
9b
d3
0d
7f
04
7f
85
9b
d3
0d
7f
04
7f
85
9b
d3
0d
7f
04
7f
85
9b
d3
0d
7f
04
9b
d3
0d
9b
d3
0d
9b
d3
0d
.
.
.
.
problem 2
---------
the sequence of events is as follows:
1. printer status: paper out
2. no response to status request
3. insert paper and turn key off and on
4. then printer sends many asynchrone reports:
printer ok
5. two of the reports are incorrect. the printer
sends 2 consecutive del characters, which
are erroneous
the sequence on the com-tester is:
char. ltux mstp
no. dte dce comments
-------------------------
paper out, key on
0 9b no response to printer status
d3
0d
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
81 9b
d3
0d insert paper, turn key off, turn key on
84 7f
80
7f
80
.
.
.
.
7f
80
108 7f
7f ? ltux detect error
80
111 7f
7f ?
80
7f
80
7f
80
7f
80
7f
80
122 7f
80 ltux close protocol rts,cts off
7f asy.rep:unexpected ̲device ̲action
80
7f
80
.
.
.
.
7f
80
7f the printer sends 2 consecutive "del"
399 80 7fh characters. This is an error.
you are kindly requested to solve the 2 problems so the
printers can be modified and the solution verified when
you arrive at chr.rovsing a/s on 840123.
kind regards,
christian rovsing a/s
kurt nybroe-nielsen
1983-12-14 jho/bko
to: shnmo division
att.: mr. david levy, contracting officer
cc.: ltc henning hofmann, camps program manager
fm: christian rovsing a/s, denmark
kurt nybroe-nielsen
our ref: cps/101/tlx/1083
subject: unsettled invoices on camps project
--------------------------------------------
listed below please find the invoices which are due for
payment, but are still wholly or partly unsettled:
shape overdue payments 83-12-13
Inv.Date Inv.No. Due Date Unpaid Dkr. Ref. Items
300383 30611 300583 67,462.80 9009 FAT 5, 15
231282 30756 230283 411,452.64 9009 RSPL,Manuals
310583 31162 310783 60.08 9009 Spares 2
130683 31170 130883 259,602.30 9009 Test equipm.adv.pay
310783 34569 300983 266,328.59 9009 (Rerout.SW,Dev.Crs.
(Spares 4
301083 35755 201183 4,560,151.20 9317 (Ref System
300983 35752 301183 1,416,016,44 9009 FAT 3 printers,
re-
------------ sync,spares
Dkr. 6,981,074.05
Inv.Date Inv.No. Due Date Unpaid Dlrs. Ref. Items
310882 25945 021082 12,634.35 9009 Discs,OMDT
300383 30610 300583 89,692.63 9009 FAT 15
231282 30749 230283 69,591.04 9009 Test Procedures
030283 30963 030483 20,460.61 9009 Printer
301083 35756 201183 188,971.74 9317 Ref System
300983 34577 301183 49,047.23 9009 (Printers, Resync,
------------ (Spares, FAT
3
US dlrs. 430,397.60
(eq dkr. 4,131,816.96)
Inv.Date Inv.No. Due Date Unpaid P.UK. Ref. Items
201282 30361 200283 11,729.93 9009 Offline SW Pack
300383 30619 300583 110,318.36 9009 FAT 5, 15
310783 31173 300983 94,632.95 9009 SW Packs, FAT
12
------------
US dlrs. 216,681.24
eq dkr. 3,076,873.60
Total: Dkr. 14,189,764.61
------------------
please explain why the overdue invoices have not yet been
wholly paid.
Kind regards,
CHRISTIAN ROVSING A/S
Kurt Nybroe-Nielsen
1983-09-19 jho/bko
to: shnmo division
att.: mr. david levy, contracting officer
cc.: ltc henning hofmann, camps program manager
fm: christian rovsing a/s, denmark
kurt nybroe-nielsen
our ref: cps/101/tlx/0963
subject: comments to amendment no. 8
------------------------------------
cr forwards the following comments to draft of camps
contract amendment no.8:
1. page purchase order, item 1
---------------------------
the payment for message relay function dkr 1,000,000
has not been included in the payment plan.
2. page purchase order, item 6
---------------------------
update instructions to item 6: required quantity of
disc storage has not been included in the instructions
of amendment 8.
3. page purchase order, item 7
---------------------------
please inform us when final installation is scheduled
to take place, to be added to the installation schedule.
4. page purchase order, item 8
---------------------------
please reference the message or agreement to be included
in the contract. this item has not been included in
any of the change instructions.
5. page purchase order, additional items
-------------------------------------
cr propose that the following additional items are
included in amendment 8:
a. camps installation and spa schedule as agreed in
camps log 1344 and cps/101/tlx/0937.
b. the rescheduling of the training payment plan as
agreed in pmom 14, item 15.
6. page 5, line 2 (editorial)
--------------------------
change dkr 3,231,984 to dkr 3,241,984.
7. page 5, line "verona" (editorial)
---------------------------------
change dkr 2,687,525 to dkr 2,685,525.
8. page, line 4 (editorial)
------------------------
change instruction 22 to instruction 23.
9. page 7, line "3 extender board" (editorial)
-------------------------------------------
change dkr 23,586 to dkr 23,582.
10. page, line 5
------------
cr propose that "shall take place on 21 nov 83 at the
earliest, and no later than 1 dec 83" is changed to
(in accordance with pmom 18, para 8): "shall be completed
no later than 14 december 83."
11. page 9, column (2) (editorial)
------------------------------
medeast - atbb drawing should read 1982-09
12. installation and spa-dates
--------------------------
cr suggest that the columns installation start and
spa are adjusted in accordance with the schedule agreed
in camps log no 1344
location installation spa
start
-------------------------------------
shape 06.04.83 84-06
northag/2ataf 20.06.83 84-06
afcent/aafce 03.10.83 84-07
sonor 17.10.83 84-08
medeast 02.01.84 84-09
ncs 07.11.83 84-08
mednoreast 02.04.84 84-06
ukair 20.02.84 84-09
natohq 02.01.84 84-07
baltap 09.01.84 84-07
afnorth 27.02.84 84-08
lse/6ataf 20.02.84 84-07
centag/4ataf 09.04.84 84-06
comnon 21.05.84 84-08
afsouth 28.06.84 84-09
ls/5ataf 09.07.84 84-09
13. new instruction 6.3
-------------------
In accordance with instruction 2 please add new instruction
6.3: "para 16.4: in accordance with shape decision
to implement a design software change, sub-article
16.4 is cancelled in its entirety".
14. Instruction 9
-------------
cr propose the following wording of new para 23.5 in
accordance with pmom 18, para 9 and 12:
"cr recognizes that shape is caused problems in the
training area due to the slippage within the 240 hours
in-plant software test:
a. cr compensate the problem in the following manner:
rst3 and mt6 to 8 training courses are rescheduled
as follows:
rst3 84-week-3 to 84-week-19
mt6 84-week-1 to 84-week-7
mt7 84-week-8 to 84-week-14
mt8(ncs) 84-week-21 to 84-week-27
b. on rst2 and rst3 courses up to 10 students are
allowed, including possible attendance by depot
level technicians according to separate contract.
the above mentioned compensation shall be carried out
at no charge within the existing contract price."
15. page 12 (editorial)
-------------------
change in "total as of amend no 8, nato site per eqpt"
dkr 4,001,569.00 to dkr 4,001,501.00.
16. page 15 (editorial)
-------------------
change in item 8.1.e dkr 865,612.00 to dkr 865,341.00.
change total dkr 39,832,459.00 to dkr 39,832,188.00.
17. page 15 (editorial)
-------------------
change in instruction 13.2: item 8.4.5 to item 8.4.7.
(l.i. 8.4.5 is assigned to codification).
18. page 15 (editorial)
-------------------
change in line 8.4.6: dkr 865,612.00 to dkr 865,341.00.
19. page 15 (editorial)
-------------------
change in instruction 13.2 dkr 38,506,847 to dkr 38,506,576.
20. page 15
-------
change instruction 13.3 to "following letter-of-intent
shape shall effect an advance payment of 30 percent
calculated on the total value of line items 8.4.6 and
8.4.7 dkr 1,729,602.30".
21. page 16 editorial
-----------------
change in line 1: dkr 22,330,747 to dkr 3,430,000.
22. page 16. new instruction
------------------------
Add new instruction 13.5:
shape shall pay the remaining 70 percent of dkr 865,341
upon satisfactory acceptance of the tools and test
equipment at cr factory and cr provision of:
1. subcontractor's and/or cr certificate of compliance
2. danish hmac qa certification
3. cr's presentation of a properly documented invoice
4. cr will limit the request for partial payment to
a total of two (2) invoices up to dkr 605,738.70
23. page 17 (editorials)
-------------------
in line 4 change dkr 324,984.00 to dkr 3,241,984.00.
in line 5 change dkr 2,146,708.00 to dkr 2,146,708.80.
in line 6 change dkr 391,618.60 to dkr 391,018.60.
in line 7 change dkr 55,859.00 to dkr 55,859.80.
24. page 18 (editorials)
--------------------
in item 2 change "ctx cable" to "ctx crate".
in "total hardware" change dkr 2,897,020 to dkr 2,897,920.
25. page 20 (editorial)
-------------------
change wording in ecp27 to: "and to increase integrity
and maintainability..."
26. page 20
-------
add wording in ecp28: "exercise message and statistics
print".
27. page 20
-------
in ecp21 add approval date 7/83.
28. page 21
-------
in eco22 please delete "approval withheld pending update
of icd/003, refer to shape tlx no 46" as eco22 has
been approved in log 1124. add approval date 3/83.
29. page 21
-------
in eco24 add approval date 7/83.
please state concurrence in above comments so a final
amendment 8 can be completed.
kind regards,
CHRISTIAN ROVSING A/S
Kurt Nybroe-Nielsen
I S S U E 2
Til: BKO, DHH
Fra: VHN
V̲e̲d̲r̲.̲:̲ ̲W̲A̲N̲G̲ ̲S̲y̲s̲t̲e̲m̲
Jeg har oprettet dokument nr. 4742A til "store og f`le"
telexer.
Jeg vil foresl>, at vi, hver gang vi skal skrive oven
i disse, g]r det i 4742A.
Skriver I andre telexer, som I synes er slemme overflyttes
de til 4742A.
4744A er dokumentet til "slemme" tekster.
Med venlig hilsen
Vini
1984-01-17 KNB/dhh
to: Harris corp.
rochester n.y.
att.: Mr. Paul Larue
fm: christian rovsing a/s, denmark
knud benkjer
our ref: xfx/101/tlx/0028
subject: SRD, ICD and PIP
-------------------------
1 Acknowledge receipt of 45 Discrepancy Notes on January
16th. These DN's seem to represent Harris initial comments
to the SRD. Please advise when CR will receive comments
from NODECA.
2 As stated in the progress report, all comments to the
SRD must be in out possession one week prior to the
review meeting. CR reserves the right to postphone
the planned review meeting 31. jan. thru 4. Feb. and
adjust the master schedule accordingly, in case not
all comments have been received on or before January
23rd.
3 In general the SRD specifies w̲h̲a̲t̲ shall be implemented
and the SDS describes h̲o̲w̲ this will be done. The ICD's
in general details a w̲h̲a̲t̲ by specification of h̲o̲w̲'s
and are therefore design documents.
The difference between an ICD and a SDS is that the
ICD addresses the design of an external interface to
which the users may have special interests (ship/shore
procedures, man/machine interface etc.).
In order to understand some SRD specifications it is
envisoned that a demonstration of h̲o̲w̲ will help to
achieve approval.
All ICD's are therefore scheduled to be present in
draft versions for the SRD review meeting.
No cross reference matrix IFB to ICD is planned or
found needed. Where the IFB to SRD matrix instead of
specification of a SRD paragraph calls out an ICD,
the specific IFB paragraph contains design (e.g. ACP126
to ACP127 conversion).
4 We have not received any comments to the following
ICD's:
- ACP127 and ACP126 procedures
- NICS TARE I/F
- TRC I/F
Comments should be in our possession 6th January (ref.
progress report). Please note that review of above
documents not is part of the SRD review meeting except
as indicated in item 3 above.
5 Ref. your telex CFX-101 item 2:
OEM ̲handbook with prior nato approval "as is" and other
manuals including those identified during Rochester
meetings 12 thru 14 December 1983 will be made available
for Harris review during the SRD review meeting.
6 Ref. your telex CFX-101 item 3:
A general revision of PAD/PLN/001 is ongoing and will
be followed by a revision of all QA procedures. None
of the existing QA procedures will therefore be signed
by the Systems Division Manager. The MPF project and
the QA department will regardless missing signatures
live up to the delivered QA-plan. Suggest that revised
QA-procedures are inspected by the Goverment Quality
Assurance Representative (GQAR) during his normal visits
at CR's facilities.
Please advise if a meeting shall be arranged between
our QA-department and Harris representatives during
the SRD review.
7 We are in possession of the March 1983 version of the
NICS TARE Technical Interface Criteria document. Still
we have not received any of the missing documents detailed
in the monthly progress report. The missing documentation
is now critical and it is very hard to see how an impact
on the master schedule can be avoided.
Please submit status on missing documents.
Kind regards,
CHRISTIAN ROVSING A/S
Knud Benkjer
1984-01-17 KNB/dhh
to: Harris corp.
rochester n.y.
att.: Mr. Paul Larue
fm: christian rovsing a/s, denmark
knud benkjer
our ref: xfx/101/tlx/0028
subject: SRD, ICD and PIP
-------------------------
1 Acknowledge receipt of 45 Discrepancy Notes on January
16th. These DN's seem to represent Harris initial comments
to the SRD. Please advise when CR will receive comments
from NODECA.
2 As stated in the progress report, all comments to the
SRD must be in out possession one week prior to the
review meeting. CR reserves the right to postphone
the planned review meeting 31. jan. thru 4. Feb. and
adjust the master schedule accordingly, in case not
all comments have been received on or before January
23rd.
3 In general the SRD specifies w̲h̲a̲t̲ shall be implemented
and the SDS describes h̲o̲w̲ this will be done. The ICD's
in general details a w̲h̲a̲t̲ by specification of h̲o̲w̲'s
and are therefore design documents.
The difference between an ICD and a SDS is that the
ICD addresses the design of an external interface to
which the users may have special interests (ship/shore
procedures, man/machine interface etc.).
In order to understand some SRD specifications it is
envisoned that a demonstration of h̲o̲w̲ will help to
achieve approval.
All ICD's are therefore scheduled to be present in
draft versions for the SRD review meeting.
No cross reference matrix IFB to ICD is planned or
found needed. Where the IFB to SRD matrix instead of
specification of a SRD paragraph calls out an ICD,
the specific IFB paragraph contains design (e.g. ACP126
to ACP127 conversion).
4 We have not received any comments to the following
ICD's:
- ACP127 and ACP126 procedures
- NICS TARE I/F
- TRC I/F
Comments should be in our possession 6th January (ref.
progress report). Please note that review of above
documents not is part of the SRD review meeting except
as indicated in item 3 above.
5 Ref. your telex CFX-101 item 2:
OEM ̲handbook with prior nato approval "as is" and other
manuals including those identified during Rochester
meetings 12 thru 14 December 1983 will be made available
for Harris review during the SRD review meeting.
6 Ref. your telex CFX-101 item 3:
A general revision of PAD/PLN/001 is ongoing and will
be followed by a revision of all QA procedures. None
of the existing QA procedures will therefore be signed
by the Systems Division Manager. The MPF project and
the QA department will regardless missing signatures
live up to the delivered QA-plan. Suggest that revised
QA-procedures are inspected by the Goverment Quality
Assurance Representative (GQAR) during his normal visits
at CR's facilities.
Please advise if a meeting shall be arranged between
our QA-department and Harris representatives during
the SRD review.
7 We are in possession of the March 1983 version of the
NICS TARE Technical Interface Criteria document. Still
we have not received any of the missing documents detailed
in the monthly progress report. The missing documentation
is now critical and it is very hard to see how an impact
on the master schedule can be avoided.
Please submit status on missing documents.
Kind regards,
CHRISTIAN ROVSING A/S
Knud Benkjer
1984-03-14 URH/dhh
to: shnmo division
att.: mr. david levy, contracting officer
cc.: ltc henning hofmann, camps program manager
fm: christian rovsing a/s, denmark
kurt nybroe-nielsen
our ref: cps/101/tlx/1164
subject: CAMPS in-plant software test specification and
procedures CPS/TPR/007, issue 4
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Ref. CAMPS log 1643
i. CR provides the following answers to SHAPE's comments
contained in above ref.
1.1 CR agrees
1.2 CR agrees
1.3 The remaining parameters are left at their default
values which are:
a. send continuity messages to NICS TARE every
5 mins.
b. expect continuity messages from NICS TARE
every 6 mins: yes
c. service message generated if more than 140
identical consecutive characters received
: yes
d. expect flash receipt within 20 mins.
4 If no. 3-letter group is following format line
12b prosign "sic" then format line 12b is considered
present but garbled.
5 1+2: will be added as appendicies to the subject
document
5 3+4: no changes will be made, ref. iii below.
ii 1 according to CR's files CPS/TPR/008 is approved
cat. 1 by SHAPE. However, CR agrees to delete
all references to CPS/TPR/008 in the subject
document.
2 according to the data base all users have release
capabilities, however, the associated release
terminal for terminals SEC, OPA and OPC is VDU
OPB.
3-8 CR agrees
iii CR agrees to include a demonstration of CSSI
support software during the functional software
test at SHAPE. The procedure will be included
in CPS/TPR/008. The demonstration shall be performed
in less than one working day.
In the subject document paras 2.1.3 and 2.1.4, references
to SRS para 3.5.11.3 are deleted. References to SRS
para 3.5.11.5 are changed to: "part of 3.5.11.5 a)
and 3.5.11.5.2".
iv Based on findings during the latest dry runs CR kindly
requests the following further updates to the subject
document:
1 p. 48, case 7.3 last line should read: "add SCD's
OPA and OPO to the coordination list "p. 129,
case 7.3 last line should read: "add SCD's OPO
and OSA to the coordination list" p. 209, case
7.3. "add SCD's OSA and OPA to the coordination
list". Reason: the third SCD in the message points
to a MSP.
2 p. 59, 140 and 220, step 13.7: "and release it"
shall be deleted. Reason: release terminal cannot
be reached.
2a p 248, test msg. no 309: specat pp shall be changed
to ee dk. reason: vdu opc does not have specat
pp capabilities.
3 p. 63, 144, 224, step 18.3-4: the referenced
testmessage shall be numbered "-2". Reason: "-1"
has already been used.
4 p. 85, 165 and 246, test msg.no, X07: special
handling DD shall be deleted. Reason: this msg.
is used for demonstration of exempt on info PLA's,
however, the release terminal does not have specat
DD capabilities.
5 p. 113, 193 and 274, test msg. no. X35: local
distribution SCD shall be changed to: DPD. Reason:
the device associated to SCD NMP is not included
in the test setup.
6 p. 325, 380, and 438, step 6.2: No warning report
is generated for controlled lines. Reason: On
controlled lines end of message is indicated
in the level 2 protocol and detection of a halted
message is done on level 2 and not on a missing
eotf.
7 p. 326, 381, and 439, step 10.2, result: the
message is also routed to the MSO for RI assignment.
Reason: the garbled fl. 10 is interpreted as
an unrecogniseable PLA.
8 p. 332, step 29.2: Add: "29.2 a VDU SEC SIOF".
Reason: Distribution to the quiet hours terminal
only takes place if the destination terminal
is signed off.
9 P. 379 and 437, step 4.2, result: the message
is queued at the destination user VDU. Reason:
on controlled lines start of message is indicated
in the level 2 protocol and a missing SOTF does
not prevent normal automatic message processing.
No warning report is generated.
10 P. 383, step 18.2, result: the message is queued
at VDU OPA. Reason: messages from scars shall
not be relayed based on t-instructions. ref.
srs para 3.2.2.5.1.
11 p. 444, steps 25.3 and 25.4 shall be deleted.
reason: flash receipt is generated automatically
by the tds.
12 p. 434 and 444-445, case 26: this testcase shall
be deleted. reason: the tds automatically generates
flash receipts and, therefore, this situation
cannot be simulated.
13 p. 320, 325, 375, 380, 433, and 438, case 7:
this testcase shall be deleted. Reason: too long
lines are an unacceptable deviation for uncontrolled
lines only. ref: icd/003 para. 4.2.2.2.
v you are kindly requested to review the requested updates
and submit your comments/indicaton of approval.
kind regards,
christian rovsing a/s
kurt nybroe-nielsen
